5 keys to engage your audience when giving a public speech

Dr. James Helmer gives a tremendous essay on how to engage your audience…

How to Engage Your Audience and Keep Them with You
James Helmer, Oral Communication Center, Hamilton College

I. Design an effective introduction.
A. Engage the audience—get them interested, give them a reason to listen. How?
 Describe a scene or a character.
 Tell a story.
 Share a personal experience.
 Relate to a recent event.
 Piggyback on a previous speaker’s remark or theme.
 Point out something important about the audience or the current setting.
 Show a compelling visual image.
 Ask a provocative question.
 State a fact that is troubling, amusing, or remarkable.
 Spell out what’s at stake for your listeners.
 Offer a humorous observation or anecdote.
 Explain your own interest in the topic.
 Tell listeners what the topic has to do with them.
B. Focus the presentation—tell listeners what it’s about. State the presentation’s goal or
your thesis or research question. Tell listeners what they’ll learn.

C. Preview what’s to follow—your points, your approach, or the type of content.
II. Gear your treatment of content to your listeners’ knowledge, experience, and interests.
A. Define unfamiliar terms.
B. Use concrete, specific examples to illustrate points. Tell stories.
C. Make statistics meaningful: Use graphics to help clarify numerical data. Round off
big numbers. Interpret stats, translate them into human terms. Make comparisons.
D. Use analogies to relate the unknown to the known. (“It’s kind of like…”)
E. Build audience involvement by making your subject immediate, personal, and local.
1. Connect to the here-and-now.
2. Refer to your listeners’ experience. Mention your own experience.
Personalize the subject when that’s appropriate.
3. Highlight the local angle—a person, a place, an event. Bring it home.
III. Help your listeners find their way through your presentation.
A. Use previews and summaries.
1. Previews tell listeners what’s coming next or how you’re going to develop a
point. For instance, in a discussion of why discrepancies exist between cars’
EPA gas mileage ratings and actual gas mileage, you might say “First I’m
going to explain how the EPA arrives at its numbers. Then I’ll explain how
the Consumers Union conducts its tests.”
2. Summaries remind listeners of what’s important in what was just covered. A
summary is especially useful in reframing or refocusing the discussion after a
string of supporting details or after any fairly lengthy discussion of a point.
B. Use signposts and transitions.
1. Signposts are words or phrases such as “In the first place…,” “The second
issue is…,” “The key argument is…,” etc. They tell the audience where they
are in the presentation and flag what’s important to note or remember.
2. Transitions make sure no one gets left behind when you move from one point
to the next. They show how pieces of content relate to one another and to
your thesis; they tie things together and improve “flow.” Transitions in oral
presentations often must be more obvious than those used in writing. They
tell listeners not only that you’re moving on but also where you’re going
next. Changes in body position, gestures, and voice can help listeners
recognize a transition.
IV. Use language and verbal devices that are clear to the ear.
A. Avoid vague pronoun references. These are bad in writing but terrible in speech.
Listeners don’t have the option of looking back over the text to figure them out.
B. Similarly, avoid words like “respectively” (as in “John, Ashley, and Tamika
represented the Departments of Economics, Biology, and English, respectively.”) and
“the former…the latter” (as in “You can purchase beef that is either dry-aged or
wet-aged. Professional chefs know that, for the best steaks, you want the latter.”).
Like pronouns, both of these constructions require the audience to remember certain
details in order to understand a later reference to them. The problem is that listeners
may not have paid close enough attention to the earlier details; they didn’t realize
they’d be “tested” on them later. Whenever you’re tempted to use this type of verbal
device, ask yourself, “If I had only my ear to depend on and heard it only once,
would I get it?”
V. Design an effective conclusion.
A. Summarize and refocus. Recap the main points or arguments you’ve covered.
Reiterate your purpose, thesis, or research question. Reinforce what’s important for
the audience to take away from your presentation.
B. Close. Create closure, a sense of finality. Here you can use many of the same kinds
of devices suggested for openings. You can even return to exactly the same
anecdote, quotation, or remark you used at the beginning—and give it a twist. Other
approaches are to lay down a challenge, look to the future, or simply to firmly restate
your basic conclusion or recommendation. Avoid introducing new evidence or
opening a new line of argument.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

How does Ron Paul do it? His speeches are spot on ….

How is it that Ron Paul can be so progressive and smart in his thought process for economic ideals?

This according to Ron Paul’s website -

Bankruptcy is Economic Stimulus

The distraction on Capitol Hill this week has to do with the jackpot bonuses that executives at AIG recently received. The argument is over a relative drop in the bucket. The total amount of bonuses given out was $165 million. The government has put $170 billion into AIG so far. Many now are demanding we get this money back. We ought to be spending our time and effort doing something more worthwhile, like figuring out how the Federal Reserve is handling the trillions of dollars they are creating and pumping into the economy, and how that is affecting the purchasing power of dollars in your pocket.

The big mistake was appropriating the TARP funds in the first place. A Johnny-come-lately bill of attainder won’t stop the spending epidemic. This whole situation is a perfect demonstration of why “doing nothing” and letting failing companies fail would have been much better than sinking valuable money and resources into them.

When a company makes a profit, it is a signal that it is taking resources and increasing their value while controlling costs. When a company operates at a loss, it is a signal that it is decreasing the value of its resources or letting out-of-control costs outstrip any value it has created. A company operating at a loss is therefore an engine of wealth destruction. Bankruptcies are a net positive for the economy because more productive competitors are rewarded by opportunities to buy up remaining assets at bargain prices to strengthen their operations. In an economy that allows this kind of growth and change, any jobs lost by bankruptcy are soon replaced by new ones as the most efficiently managed businesses gain access to more assets and expand.

Bankruptcy was the stimulus that we needed in the case of AIG. More bankruptcies would clean out malinvested resources and enable economic growth again.

AIG, by losing money and maneuvering their operations to the brink of bankruptcy, was telling us that they were inefficient. So what did we do? We forced the taxpayer to assume the losses, and now we are supposed to be shocked that it is not working out. Had AIG gone bankrupt, it would have been impossible to hand out these bonuses. The taxpayer would have been fleeced for $170 billion less last year. Had they gone bankrupt, the world would not have come to an end, it would just continue on with one less engine of wealth destruction.

We should have learned from Japan. The 1990’s is referred to as Japan’s “lost decade” because of the zombie banks kept on life support by the Japanese government. Any productivity was redirected through these engines of wealth destruction, resulting in long term stagnation. We should and can avoid this outcome if we come to our senses.

A recession should be a time of strengthening and regrouping for an economy. But as long as the government insists on maintaining the status quo by propping up failed institutions, we will continue to dig a bigger hole for ourselves.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Ron Paul – Mr. Prolific Speaker with D.L. Hughley

D.L. Hughley Loves Ron Paul

This is a great and funny interview. I particularly liked the Lincoln/slavery/Civil War comments at the end. I’ll now try to make a point to watch Hughley’s show more often (via Eric A. Garris at LewRockwell.com)

Ron Paul is Mr. Prolific Speaker

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Penelope Cruz to Victory in Oscars 2009 as best supporting actress

penelope-cruz-best-actress-oscars

penelope-cruz-best-actress-oscars

Oscars 2009! Best Supporting Actress is Penélope Cruz

Oscar , oscar 2009 , oscar 2009 results , oscar awards , oscar awards 2009 , oscar awards 2009 live , oscar awards live , oscar broadcast , oscar live , oscar live stream , oscar nacht , oscar news , oscar night , oscar night 2009 , oscar online , Oscar results , oscar results 2009 , oscar time , oscar winner , oscar winners , oscar winners 2009 , Oscars , oscars results , Penelope Cruz

Did Penelope Cruz deserve to win best supporting actress?

Please leave a comment!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark